The news says: The Oyo State Police Command has stated that a report alleging the death of one of the schoolchildren abducted during the recent terrorist attack on three schools in Ahoro-Esiele, Oriire Local Government Area is “malicious and entirely unfounded.” The Command’s spokesperson, DSP Ayanlade Olayinka, issued the denial on Friday, June 5, 2026.
Who are the people involved in this denial?
The Oyo State Police Command, DSP Ayanlade Olayinka (Command spokesperson), anonymous individuals or groups who published the alleged death report (described as “purveyors of misinformation”), the abducted schoolchildren and teachers of Ahoro-Esiele, their families, bloggers and social media influencers, and the general public.
Where did this happen?
The abductions happened in Ahoro-Esiele, Oriire Local Government Area, Oyo State. The police statement was issued from Oyo State Police Command headquarters. The false report circulated online and on social media.
What did the police say?
The police categorically denied that any schoolchild has died in captivity. They described the report as “false, misleading, mischievous, and without any factual basis whatsoever.” They said no recognised security agency has confirmed such a development. They accused the authors of using “emotional narratives, speculative claims, and unverified accounts” to manipulate public opinion.
When did this happen?
The abductions occurred on May 15, 2026. The false death report circulated after that. The police issued their denial on Friday, June 5, 2026.
Why did the police issue this denial?
Because false information can cause panic, undermine security operations, and traumatise families. The police said the false report was “craftily crafted” to “arouse unnecessary public sentiment, create panic, spread fear, and undermine ongoing security operations.” They also warned that misinformation “advances the very objectives of criminal elements and terror merchants who thrive on fear.”
How did the police respond to the false report?
They issued a strong, detailed statement. They categorically denied the death. They cautioned individuals, bloggers, social media influencers, and media platforms against publishing unverified security-related information. They urged the public to rely solely on official channels.
6 things you must know about this police denial.
1. The police did not say all the children are alive – they only denied that a death has been confirmed. This is a crucial distinction. The police said: “At no time has the Oyo State Police Command, nor any other recognised security agency involved in the ongoing rescue efforts, confirmed such a development.” That means no official confirmation of death. It does not mean no death has occurred. It means the police have not verified or announced any death. The children could still be alive. But the police denial is about official confirmation, not about the actual fate of the children.
2. The police accused the false report of “undermining ongoing security operations.” This is significant. Security operations often involve negotiations. Kidnappers monitor the news. If they see false reports of a child’s death, they may become more violent or break off negotiations. They may kill a child to prove the report wrong. False information is not harmless. It can get hostages killed.
3. The police warned that misinformation “advances the objectives of criminal elements.” This is a powerful statement. The police are saying that people spreading false reports are helping the kidnappers. Terror merchants “thrive on fear, uncertainty, and public distress.” When the public panics, the kidnappers gain leverage. The government faces more pressure. The kidnappers can demand more. The police are asking the public to stop being tools of the terrorists.
4. The police did not provide any evidence – no proof of life, no photos, no medical reports. The police denied the death report. But they did not show that the children are alive. They did not release a proof-of-life video. They did not provide any medical examination. Their denial is a statement, not evidence. Families who have not heard from their children will not be comforted by a police press release. They need proof.
5. This denial comes over three weeks after the abduction – on May 15. The abduction happened on May 15. The police issued this denial on June 5. That is 21 days. For three weeks, families have not known if their children are alive or dead. A police denial of a death report is not the same as a rescue. The children are still missing. The teacher was beheaded. The police have not secured their release. The denial addresses a rumour – not the underlying crisis.
6. The police threatened bloggers and content creators – but not the kidnappers. The police cautioned “individuals, bloggers, social media influencers, online content creators, and media platforms” against publishing unverified information. They did not announce any new operation against the kidnappers. They did not announce arrests. The statement was focused on misinformation, not on rescuing the children. The public may wonder: why is the police’s energy going towards threatening bloggers instead of hunting kidnappers?
How this affects Nigerians.
i. It shows that the police are monitoring social media – but not necessarily the forests. The police responded quickly to a false online report. That is good. But the children are in a forest, not on social media. The public wants the police to respond to kidnappers with the same speed they respond to bloggers.
ii. It highlights the danger of spreading unverified information during hostage situations. False reports can get hostages killed. Kidnappers read the news. They see reports of death and may react violently. The public must be responsible. Verify before sharing. Lives depend on it.
iii. It does not give families the reassurance they need. A police denial is not a video call with the child. It is not a medical examination. It is not a rescue. Families want their children back – not a statement about what has not been confirmed.
iv. It raises questions about the official communication strategy. The police are quick to deny false reports. But they are slow to provide positive information. Where are the daily updates? Where are the briefings for families? A reactive communication strategy is not enough. The police should proactively provide verified information – not just react to rumours.
v. It puts pressure on the government to prove the children are alive. The police say no death has been confirmed. The next step is to confirm life. The government should work with the kidnappers to get a proof-of-life video or message. Families need to see that their children are alive. A police statement is not enough.
vi. It may discourage whistleblowers from sharing information. The police threatened bloggers and content creators. That may make citizens afraid to share any security-related information – even if it is true. The goal should be to stop false information, not to stop all information. The police must distinguish between malicious falsehoods and genuine tips.
Advice from this analyst.
1. To the Oyo State Police Command: you have denied the death report. Now show proof of life. Work with the kidnappers to get a video or photo of the children. Release it to the families. A denial is not enough. Evidence of life is what families need.
2. To the public and social media users: stop sharing unverified reports. If you see a claim that a child has died, wait for official confirmation. Sharing false reports can endanger the hostages. Your share button can kill. Use it responsibly.
3. To bloggers and content creators: verify before you publish. The police are watching. If you publish false information, you could face legal consequences. But also, do not be afraid to report verified facts. The public needs information. Your job is to provide accurate, verified information – not silence.
4. To the families of the abducted children: the police say no death has been confirmed. That is not comfort. But it is not despair either. The children may still be alive. Continue to pressure the government for rescue. Do not give up hope.
5. To the Federal Government: secure the release of these children. A police denial of a death rumour is not a victory. The victory is when the children come home. Every day they remain in captivity, the risk of death increases. Do not let a false report distract from the real crisis.
6. To the National Orientation Agency (NOA): launch a public campaign on verifying security information. Teach Nigerians how to check sources, wait for official confirmation, and avoid sharing unverified reports. Education is better than threats.
Rhetorical question for you.
If the police can quickly issue a statement denying a false report about a child’s death, why can they not quickly issue a statement confirming that the children have been rescued?
The answer is painful. Because denial is easy. Rescue is hard. The police can type a statement in minutes. Rescuing children from terrorists can take weeks or months – or never happen. The public should not confuse speed of communication with effectiveness of operation.
🎓 Attend 2026 JAMB, Post-UTME, WAEC, and NECO GCE Tutorials
Get fully prepared with expert tutors, comprehensive study materials, and personalised academic guidance at Akahi Tutors.
📍 Located at 67, Oduduwa College Road, Off Sabo Junction, Ile-Ife.
📞 Call: 08038644328
for enrollment and accommodation reservation.
Akahi News reports that the Oyo State Police Command says no schoolchild has died in captivity. They call the death report false and malicious. They warn bloggers and content creators. But the children are still missing. The teacher is still dead. The families are still waiting. A denial of bad news is not good news. Good news is when the children walk free. Until then, every statement – true or false – is just noise. The only signal that matters is the sound of children returning home. That sound has not been heard. Not yet.