Somewhere in Abuja right now, there is a woman sitting across a dinner table from her husband of eleven years, passing him the egusi soup she has prepared with the same careful attention she has brought to every meal in this marriage, asking about his day with the same genuine interest she has always shown, listening to his answer with the same quiet attentiveness that he has come to expect and rely upon. She remembers his mother’s birthday before he does. She defends his decisions to her own family even when she privately disagrees with them. She introduces him in public with a warmth and a pride that his colleagues have noticed and commented on. She has never, in eleven years, spoken about him with contempt — not to her friends, not to her sister, not even in the privacy of her own diary.
She also does not love him.
Not in the way that the word was designed to be used — not with the bone-deep, soul-level, irrational and irreplaceable attachment that genuine love produces. She cares for him. She is genuinely committed to his wellbeing. She is a faithful and excellent wife by every observable measure. But somewhere in the architecture of her feeling for him, the thing that should be at the centre — the thing that makes a marriage a chosen relationship rather than a managed arrangement — is simply not there. It was perhaps never fully there. Or perhaps it was there once, in a different form, and has quietly transformed into something more like deep regard than love. She has never told him this. She is not sure she has fully told herself.
Now shift the scene. Somewhere in Lagos, there is another woman who loves her husband with a ferocity that sometimes frightens her. She thinks about him when he is not in the room. She lights up when he walks in. The physical reality of his presence still does to her, after seven years, what it did on the first day. She chose him — continues to choose him — with a totality of emotional investment that the women in the first scenario would recognise as what they do not have and might privately envy.
She also does not respect him.
Not fully. Not in the places that matter most. She has, over the years, developed a habit of dismissing his opinions in conversation — not cruelly, but with the casual confidence of someone who has concluded that her own judgment is simply more reliable. She makes significant decisions without adequate consultation. When they are with friends, she corrects him. When they are alone, she overrides him. She loves him deeply — that is not in question — but she has, in the daily practice of the marriage, stopped treating him as someone whose perspective carries equal weight to her own.
He feels it. He has always felt it. And it is slowly doing something to him that her love, however genuine and however fierce, cannot entirely prevent.
These are not abstract characters. These are recognisable women — women whose stories exist, in various specific forms, in marriages across every city and town in Nigeria. And the question this article is asking — which of these marriages will survive? which of these women is in the better position? which deficit does less damage? — is a question that goes to the very centre of what marriage is, what it requires, and what happens when its essential components are present in partial rather than complete form.
The answer, when we arrive at it, will challenge assumptions that many readers have held for a very long time. And it will do something more important than challenge assumptions: it will offer a path forward for every person — man or woman — who recognises some version of these portraits in their own marriage.
Before the Verdict: Understanding What Respect and Love Actually Mean
The question cannot be answered well without first establishing what we actually mean by the two terms at its centre — because both love and respect, in popular Nigerian usage, are frequently understood in ways that are incomplete and that distort the analysis.
Love, in the context of marriage, is not primarily a feeling. This is perhaps the most important and most consistently resisted truth in the entire landscape of relationship education. Love as a feeling — the emotion, the attraction, the warmth, the desire for the other person’s presence — is real and is valuable. But it is not the whole of love, and it is not its most important dimension. Genuine marital love, as the scriptures describe it and as the best relationship science confirms, is primarily a committed orientation — a decision to seek the genuine wellbeing of the other person, to invest in their flourishing, to choose them consistently even when the feeling is not at its peak. 1 Corinthians 13:4-7 describes love entirely in terms of behaviours and orientations — patient, kind, not self-seeking, not easily angered, keeping no record of wrongs — without a single reference to feeling. This is not because feeling is irrelevant. It is because the biblical writers understood that feeling, without the committed orientation that sustains it through seasons when feeling is thin, is insufficient foundation for a lasting covenant.
Respect, in the context of marriage, is equally frequently misunderstood — particularly in the Nigerian context, where it is sometimes reduced to the outward performance of deference: the bowed head, the agreeable response, the surface compliance that can coexist perfectly comfortably with profound interior contempt. Genuine respect is something more specific and more demanding: it is the consistent experience of being treated as someone whose opinions carry genuine weight, whose dignity is reliably protected, whose contributions are genuinely valued, and whose authority in the areas of their legitimate competence is genuinely acknowledged. It is not agreement on every point. It is the treatment of the other person as a full human being whose perspective deserves genuine consideration rather than polite performance.
With these definitions established, the analysis can proceed with the precision the question deserves.
What Research Has Discovered: The Respect Finding That Changes Everything
Here is where the article delivers its first genuinely surprising piece of information — the research finding that forms the foundation of the answer that follows.
Dr. Emerson Eggerichs — a relationship researcher and author whose work on the dynamics of love and respect in marriage has been extensively studied and debated — identified, through years of clinical observation and research, a pattern that he termed the “Crazy Cycle”: the self-reinforcing negative loop that develops in marriages where a husband feels consistently disrespected and a wife feels consistently unloved. His central finding — controversial when first published, subsequently supported by substantial additional research — was that men and women, in the context of marital conflict, tend to experience and respond to two different primary emotional threats.
Women, in the research pattern, tend to be most acutely sensitive to the withdrawal of love — the emotional distance, the lack of warmth, the feeling of not being cherished and cared for. Men, in the research pattern, tend to be most acutely sensitive to the withdrawal of respect — the dismissiveness, the contempt, the feeling of not being valued or taken seriously by the person whose opinion matters most to them.
Now see this: Eggerichs’ research found that when a wife feels unloved, she tends to respond in ways that her husband experiences as disrespectful — she becomes critical, dismissive, or emotionally aggressive. And when a husband feels disrespected, he tends to respond in ways that his wife experiences as unloving — he withdraws emotionally, becomes distant, stops investing in the relationship. Each response to the other’s behaviour triggers the other’s primary wound, producing a cycle that escalates without anyone intending the escalation.
The implication of this research for our question is significant: disrespect — specifically a wife’s consistent disrespect toward her husband — may be more immediately damaging to the practical functioning of a marriage than the absence of deep romantic love. Because disrespect triggers the male withdrawal response, which triggers the female emotional distress response, which produces more disrespect, which produces more withdrawal — in a self-reinforcing cycle that, without intervention, moves the marriage steadily toward breakdown.
Ephesians 5:33 appears to anticipate this research finding by nearly two thousand years: “However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband.” The verse does not say the wife must love her husband — though love is commanded elsewhere. It specifically says respect. As though the inspired writer understood something about the specific emotional architecture of men in marriage that contemporary relationship research is only now systematically confirming.
The Wife Who Respects Without Loving: What Her Marriage Actually Looks Like From the Inside
Let us return to our Abuja woman — the one whose respect is genuine and whose love is absent — and examine her marriage with the honest specificity it deserves.
Her husband, in the daily experience of the marriage, feels seen. Valued. Taken seriously. When he speaks, she listens. When he decides, she supports. When he fails, she does not add her voice to the world’s assessment of his failure — she is a consistent, reliable presence in his corner. The specific, daily experience of being married to a woman who respects you is, for many Nigerian men, the experience of being genuinely at home — of having a refuge where the judgement and the performance and the proving of worth that the external world demands is suspended, and where your basic dignity is simply assumed and protected.
This experience — of consistent, genuine respect — produces, in most men, a specific and powerful response. It produces loyalty. It produces the kind of deep, invested commitment that makes a man want to be in his home rather than away from it. It produces the emotional safety that paradoxically makes genuine intimacy possible — because the man who is not defending himself from contempt has energy available for the vulnerability that intimacy requires. And in many cases — not all, but many — it produces love. Not immediately. Not dramatically. But the sustained experience of being genuinely respected by a woman has, in documented cases across cultures and research settings, produced in men an emotional attachment that began as appreciation and deepened, over time, into something that functions like love even if it arrived through an unusual door.
The marriage of the woman who respects without fully loving is often — not always, but often — a marriage that improves over time. Because respect, sustained and genuine, creates the conditions in which love can grow. The emotional environment is fundamentally safe. The man is engaged, invested, present. The foundation, while not what it ideally should be, is stable enough to build on.
But let us be honest about what is missing — because this article is not an advertisement for loveless but respectful marriages. The woman who respects without loving is carrying her own quiet cost. She is performing a form of emotional generosity that is not fully reciprocated at the deepest level — because her husband, however responsive to her respect, cannot give her back the experience of being fully, specifically, irreplaceably loved by someone who chose her with complete emotional investment. She is giving something real and receiving something that is not quite the same thing. Whether that asymmetry is sustainable depends on the specific woman, the specific marriage, and the specific degree to which the respect-generated affection that develops in the husband over time approaches what she actually needs.
The Wife Who Loves Without Respecting: What Her Marriage Actually Looks Like From the Inside
Now let us return to our Lagos woman — the one whose love is fierce and genuine and whose respect is inconsistently present — and give her marriage the same honest examination.
Her husband, in the daily experience of the marriage, knows he is loved. The warmth is real. Her delight in him is visible and genuine. She is attracted to him, invested in him, emotionally present with him in ways that a man whose wife’s heart has grown cold would immediately recognise as precious. In the moments of genuine connection — the private moments, the tender ones, the ones between just the two of them — there is something in this marriage that the first marriage does not have in the same way. A heat. A specific, personal, irreplaceable quality of being truly chosen.
But in the daily functional reality of the marriage — in the decisions and the conversations and the public moments and the management of the home and the navigation of family relationships — he does not feel like a partner of equal standing. He feels managed. Sometimes corrected. Often overlooked in the assessment of his own competence. The love is real, but it has not produced the respect that love is supposed to generate for the person it claims to cherish.
And what this produces in him is something that the warmth of her love cannot fully counteract. It produces a slow erosion of the self — a gradual diminishment of the confidence and the dignity that a man needs to fully inhabit his own life. Men who are consistently disrespected by their wives — even by wives who genuinely love them — tend to exhibit specific patterns: withdrawal from family leadership, because leadership requires the confidence that consistent disrespect erodes. Increasing absence from the home, because the home has become associated with the experience of being found wanting. A growing susceptibility to the attention of women outside the marriage — not primarily because of physical desire, but because the experience of being genuinely respected by a woman, even briefly and in a context with no future, addresses a hunger that the marriage, for all its love, has not been feeding.
Here is the gist: a husband who is consistently disrespected will not thrive in his marriage. He will either fight — which produces open conflict. Or he will withdraw — which produces the slow, silent death of a marriage that has love in it but not the conditions for love to be fully expressed and sustained. The love that does not respect is like a fire that has fuel but no air. It burns, sometimes intensely. But without the oxygen of respect, it cannot sustain itself indefinitely.
The Nigerian Cultural Context: Where Both Women Get Their Scripts
Any honest examination of this question in a Nigerian context must include an honest look at the cultural scripts that produce both women — because neither portrait appeared from nowhere. Both were formed by specific cultural inputs that shaped their understanding of what marriage requires of them.
The woman who respects without loving was often formed by a cultural and family environment that elevated the practical virtues of marriage — the keeping of a home, the management of a household, the visible support of a husband’s social position — above its emotional ones. She was taught, explicitly or implicitly, that the visible performance of wifely respect is the primary obligation of a married woman, and that the emotional interior of the marriage — what she actually feels, what she actually needs — is secondary, private, and largely irrelevant to the marriage’s success. She has done what she was taught. She has done it well. But she has also paid a price in the suppression of her own emotional reality that nobody told her she was signing up for.
The woman who loves without respecting was often formed by a different but equally specific cultural input — the romanticisation of passionate love as the supreme marital virtue, combined with an education system and a social environment that did not adequately form her in the specific discipline of marital respect. She may have grown up watching women manage marriages by managing husbands — by the exercise of the subtle, persistent, behind-the-scenes authority that produces outcomes without visibly challenging male authority. She has perhaps confused this management with partnership, and the habit of management with the practice of respect. She loves genuinely. But she has not been taught that love, to be fully expressed in a marriage, must include the genuine honouring of the person loved.
Both of these formation stories have a remedy — and the remedy is not primarily a change of behaviour. It is a change of understanding. Of what marriage is. Of what the other person in the marriage actually needs. Of what genuine love and genuine respect actually require, as opposed to what they appear to require from the outside.
What the Bible Actually Says: A Framework That Resolves the Question
The biblical framework for marriage does not present love and respect as alternative virtues that different people might prioritise differently. It presents them as simultaneous, mutually reinforcing obligations — each one incomplete without the other, each one creating the conditions that make the other possible.
Ephesians 5:25-33 lays out the full architecture. The husband is commanded to love his wife as Christ loved the church — sacrificially, completely, with the kind of love that considers the beloved’s genuine good above its own comfort. And the wife is commanded to respect her husband — to treat him with the genuine honour that his humanity and his covenantal role deserve.
But here is what the passage makes clear that is frequently overlooked in the popular reading of it: the two commands are not independent. They are meant to be mutually generative. The husband who loves as Christ loved creates, through that love, the conditions in which genuine respect becomes natural rather than forced — because a woman who is genuinely loved in the biblical sense, whose husband is laying down his preferences and his ego and his comfort in consistent service of her genuine flourishing, finds respect arising from her not as a dutiful compliance but as a genuine response to something genuinely worthy of respect.
And the wife who respects in the genuine, non-performative sense — who treats her husband as someone whose dignity and perspective and leadership genuinely matter — creates, through that respect, the conditions in which love deepens and expresses itself more fully. Because the man who is genuinely respected by his wife is a man who has the emotional safety to be more fully present, more genuinely invested, more capable of the sacrificial love the passage commands.
The divine design is a cycle — but a positive one. The opposite of the Crazy Cycle that disrespect and withdrawal produce. A cycle in which love generates the conditions for respect, and respect generates the conditions for deeper love, in a virtuous spiral that, sustained over time, produces marriages of extraordinary depth and durability.
Both women in this article’s opening portraits are missing something essential. And both absences matter. The question is which absence does more immediate damage to the marriage as a functioning unit — and the honest answer, grounded in both research and scripture, must now be delivered.
The Verdict: Which Marriage Will Survive?
Here is the answer. Stated plainly, with its full complexity acknowledged.
The marriage of the woman who respects without loving is more likely to survive — and more likely to eventually become something genuinely good — than the marriage of the woman who loves without respecting.
This verdict will surprise some readers. It may anger others — particularly those who have placed romantic love at the apex of marital virtue and who experience the suggestion that respect might be more structurally important as a kind of romantic heresy. Let the reasoning be stated clearly, because the verdict is only valuable if the reasoning is understood.
Reason One: Respect sustains the functional structure of a marriage even when the emotional peak is absent. A marriage in which both partners are consistently treating each other with genuine dignity — in which both people feel valued, heard, and taken seriously — can sustain itself, and often improve, through seasons when the emotional intensity is low. It can weather financial crisis, health challenges, the exhaustion of parenting, the monotony of long familiarity, without collapsing — because its foundation is not dependent on the maintenance of emotional peak experiences. The marriage without love but with respect has a foundation. It may not have the warmth it needs. But foundations, unlike warmth, are structural.
Reason Two: Love without respect cannot protect itself from the specific damage that disrespect produces. The intensity of the love in the disrespecting wife’s marriage is real — but it cannot compensate for the structural damage that consistent disrespect produces in the husband. His withdrawal, his diminished confidence, his growing emotional absence — these are not irrational responses to her love. They are predictable responses to her disrespect. And as his engagement with the marriage decreases, her love has less and less to attach itself to — producing the particular heartbreak of a woman who loves enormously but finds herself in a marriage that is cooling despite the heat of her feeling.
Reason Three: Respect is more directly teachable than love. This is a practical point that carries significant weight. The behaviours that constitute genuine respect — listening with genuine attention, consulting before deciding, acknowledging competence, defending dignity in public — can be identified, taught, practised, and improved with deliberate effort and appropriate support. Love — genuine, deep, specific, chosen love for a particular person — is more resistant to deliberate cultivation. You can create the conditions for it. You can choose to act lovingly. But you cannot simply decide to feel it if it is not there, and its cultivation is less amenable to the kind of specific, targeted intervention that respect can receive.
Reason Four: The research on marital dissolution points more consistently at disrespect than at the absence of romantic love. John Gottman’s decades of research on couples — research that has involved the observation of thousands of couples over extended periods — identified contempt as the single most reliable predictor of divorce. Not the absence of love. Not conflict. Not even infidelity, though infidelity is enormously destructive. Contempt — the specific behavioural expression of disrespect — was the variable most consistently associated with marriages that did not survive. This finding has been replicated across multiple research settings and multiple cultural contexts. The marriage that is being slowly consumed by contempt — by the eye rolls, the dismissals, the corrections, the overriding — is in more immediate structural danger than the marriage that is functional and stable but emotionally cooler than the ideal.
The Essential Qualification: Both Women Need to Grow
Having delivered the verdict, this article must immediately qualify it in a way that prevents it from being misread as a recommendation for loveless marriages or as a minimisation of the importance of genuine marital love.
The verdict is not that a marriage without love is acceptable. It is that, between the two deficits examined, the absence of respect produces more immediate and more structurally damaging effects on the marriage than the absence of deep romantic love. This is a comparative statement, not an endorsement of either condition.
Both women need to grow. The woman who respects without loving needs to do the honest, often difficult work of examining whether genuine love can develop in the marriage — whether there are conditions that have prevented it from taking root that can be addressed, whether professional support can help her access and express what may be present but suppressed, whether the committed orientation of love can, with time and genuine effort, develop the emotional dimension that is currently absent.
And the woman who loves without respecting needs to do the equally difficult work of examining the specific behaviours through which her disrespect expresses itself — the corrections, the dismissals, the decisions made without consultation — and replacing them, deliberately and consistently, with the specific behaviours of genuine respect. This is not the suppression of her intelligence or her opinions or her genuine capacity. It is the channelling of those things through a relational form that honours her husband as a genuine partner rather than managing him as a project.
Both women are also, in different ways, in need of honest conversation with their husbands — the kind of conversation that names, without accusation, what is missing and what is needed. These conversations are difficult. They require the courage to be vulnerable about things that are uncomfortable to admit. But they are the conversations that create the possibility of genuine change — and genuine change, in either direction, is what these marriages actually need.
What Husbands Must Hear: You Are Not a Passive Party in Either Story
This article has, by the structure of its question, focused primarily on the wife. But it would be fundamentally incomplete — and fundamentally dishonest — if it did not speak directly to the husbands in both marriages. Because neither portrait exists in a vacuum. Both are shaped, at least in part, by the husband’s own contribution to the marriage dynamic.
The husband whose wife respects him but does not love him: has he created, through genuine emotional investment and genuine vulnerability and genuine love expressed in consistent, specific action, the conditions in which her love could develop and deepen? Or has he received her respect as his due and offered in return a provision and a presence that is functionally adequate but emotionally insufficient? The wife who does not love may be reflecting, at least in part, a marriage in which genuine love has never been modelled and invited in both directions.
The husband whose wife loves him but does not respect him: has he given her genuine reasons to respect him — the consistent exercise of leadership that is worth following, the demonstrated competence that earns genuine acknowledgment, the character that commands rather than demands respect? Or has his own inconsistency, his own abdication of leadership, his own failure to bring his full self to the marriage created a vacuum that his wife’s strong personality has simply filled? The wife who does not respect may be reflecting, at least in part, a marriage in which nothing has been presented as worth fully respecting.
These are hard questions. They are meant to be. Because the honest assessment of a marriage is never the assessment of one person’s contribution in isolation. It is always the assessment of two people’s contributions to a shared dynamic — and genuine improvement always requires both people’s honest engagement with their own part in the story.
The Path Forward: What Both Marriages Actually Need
For the marriage of the woman who respects without loving, the path forward requires honesty — the honest examination of what love would require to grow in this specific marriage, with this specific person, in these specific conditions. It requires the deliberate creation of experiences of genuine connection — not the performance of connection, but its actual pursuit. It may require the support of a skilled marriage counsellor who can help both partners examine what has prevented emotional depth from developing and what conditions would allow it to grow. And it requires the patient recognition that love in its deepest form is not merely a feeling that arrives or fails to arrive — it is something that can be cultivated, in the right conditions, with the right investment, over time.
For the marriage of the woman who loves without respecting, the path forward requires a different kind of honesty — the honest examination of the specific ways in which disrespect is expressing itself and the genuine commitment to changing those specific behaviours. Not in theory. Not as a general resolution. In the specific daily moments where the correction happens, where the dismissal occurs, where the decision is made without consultation. In those moments — the small, repeated, ordinary moments where the pattern is being written and rewritten every day — the choice must be made differently. This is hard work. It requires the kind of sustained, specific, unspectacular effort that love-without-discipline rarely manages on its own. It may require professional support. It always requires the genuine humility of someone who has decided that the marriage matters more than being right.
For the Young Nigerian Reading This: Build Both Before You Need Both
If you are a young Nigerian — unmarried, or newly married, or in the early seasons of building a relationship that you hope will become a lasting marriage — this article offers you something more valuable than a verdict about someone else’s marriage. It offers you a framework for your own.
Build the respect before the marriage requires it of you in crisis. Develop, now, the habits of genuine listening, genuine consultation, genuine acknowledgement of the other person’s worth and competence. These habits, formed before the pressures of long marriage test them, are the habits that will be available to you when the test comes.
And build the conditions for genuine love — not the feeling alone, which cannot be manufactured, but the committed orientation that genuine love requires. The practice of choosing the other person. The practice of seeking their genuine good. The practice of investing in their flourishing with the consistency that transforms feeling into covenant.
Both, built together, before either deficit has had time to establish itself, are the foundation of a marriage that this article’s question will never apply to — because neither deficit will be present to compare.
And build your academic and professional foundation with the same intentionality — because the economic security that reduces marital pressure is not separate from the relational health this article is discussing. It is connected to it. If you are preparing for Post UTME, WAEC, NECO, GCE, JUPEB, Pre-degree, or School of Nursing entrance examinations — and your ambition includes admission into Obafemi Awolowo University Ile-Ife, University of Ibadan, University of Nigeria, University of Lagos, University of Calabar, University of Ilorin, or any other leading Nigerian institution — Akahi Tutors, based in Ile-Ife, provides the structured, expert preparation that serious students need to build the academic foundation that a secure future requires. Call 08038644328 or WhatsApp wa.me/2348038644328 today. The marriage you will build tomorrow is being funded by the education you are building now.
The Final Word: What Every Nigerian Marriage Actually Needs
Song of Solomon 8:6-7 captures the biblical vision of marital love with a poetry that has survived three thousand years without losing its power: “Place me like a seal over your heart, like a seal on your arm; for love is as strong as death, its jealousy unyielding as the grave. It burns like blazing fire, like a mighty flame. Many waters cannot quench love; rivers cannot sweep it away.”
This is what love in its fullest expression looks like — fierce, unquenchable, identity-marking. A seal over the heart and on the arm — private and public, interior and visible, felt and demonstrated.
And Proverbs 31:28-29 — describing the husband’s response to a wife of genuine character — says: “Her children arise and call her blessed; her husband also, and he praises her: ‘Many women do noble things, but you surpass them all.'” A husband who praises his wife this way is a husband who respects her — genuinely, publicly, completely. And a wife who has earned this praise is a wife who has loved and served her family with the full investment of who she is.
The biblical vision is not love without respect or respect without love. It is both — each one reinforcing and deepening the other, each one expressed in specific, daily, ordinary behaviours that together build something that neither alone can build.
The marriage that will truly survive — not merely function, not merely endure, but genuinely thrive across decades — is the marriage in which both are present. Both are growing. Both are being chosen, daily, by two people who understand that the covenant they made was a commitment not to a feeling but to a practice. The daily practice of love. The daily practice of respect. Each one, chosen again every morning, building — compound day by compound day — something that neither time nor pressure nor the inevitable difficulties of two human lives shared fully can finally undo.
That marriage is available. To both women in this article’s opening portraits. To every person reading these words who recognises themselves in either story. The path from where they are to where they need to be is real. It is not short. But it is open.
Walk it. Both of you. Together.
If this article has named something real in your marriage — something you have been circling around privately without quite having the language for it — do not leave it on the page. Act on it. Share it with your spouse. Send it to the friend whose marriage you have been quietly worried about. Post it where the people who need it most might find it in the moment they need it. We share because we are connected, and what heals one marriage sends ripples into every family around it.
Follow Akahi News every single day for journalism that takes the real questions of Nigerian family life seriously — honest, deeply researched, biblically grounded, and written with the genuine care of someone who believes that strong families are the foundation of everything else worth building in this country. We are here. Every day. For you.
🎓 Attend 2026 JAMB, Post-UTME, WAEC, and NECO GCE Tutorials
Get fully prepared with expert tutors, comprehensive study materials, and personalised academic guidance at Akahi Tutors.
📍 Located at 67, Oduduwa College Road, Off Sabo Junction, Ile-Ife.
📞 Call: 08038644328
for enrollment and accommodation reservation.
Written by Joseph Iyaji, Senior Journalist, Akahi News