The Advantages and Disadvantages of Regime Change Beyond Venezuela — A Global Moral, Legal and Strategic Debate
The renewed international focus on Venezuela has once again ignited an old but unresolved debate: is regime change a moral necessity, a dangerous gamble, or an unavoidable tool in confronting entrenched oppression? In a far-reaching and provocative essay, activist and writer Jarga Kebba Gigo interrogates the concept of regime change far beyond Venezuela, blending political analysis, moral philosophy, history, theology, and lived African experience to argue that regime change can be both justified and disastrous — depending on the why, how, and when.
Akahi News gathered that Gigo’s central thesis is not a blanket endorsement of forceful intervention, but a demand for intellectual honesty, evidence-based judgement, and moral consistency in how the world responds to abusive leadership.
Regime Change: What It Is — and What It Is Not
Gigo begins by challenging the loose use of the term “regime change.” While voting out a government is technically a form of regime change, global discourse usually reserves the phrase for forceful removal — through coups, rebellions, or foreign military intervention. He argues that treating all forms as morally equal is intellectually lazy.
According to him, regime change itself is only the “what.” The real moral weight lies in the why, how, when, and by whom. A civilian uprising, an internal military coup, a rebel takeover, and an external military intervention all carry vastly different risks, precedents, and consequences.
Akahi News learnt that Gigo views blind opposition to all regime change as just as dangerous as reckless support for it.
Venezuela as a Test Case, Not an Exception
With Venezuela dominating global headlines, Gigo argues it must be examined honestly, not selectively. He maintains that removing President Nicolás Maduro could be a positive development — but only if the aftermath is handled responsibly and transparently.
Among the strongest evidence cited against Maduro’s leadership is the reported exodus of roughly six million Venezuelans. Gigo contends that even if a portion of those who fled were culpable in some way, the scale of innocent suffering cannot be dismissed. In extreme cases, he argues, the suffering of even one innocent person can morally justify pre-emptive leadership removal — depending on context.
However, he warns that removing a person does not equal removing a regime. Without structural reforms, system change, and institutional accountability, leadership change risks becoming cosmetic.
Mindsets of Leaders — and the Led
A key pillar of Gigo’s argument is mindset. He insists that bad leaders exist, and granting them “blank immunity” under the banner of sovereignty is a betrayal of innocent citizens. Sovereignty, in his view, does not include the right to commit limitless wrongs without consequence.
Yet responsibility does not rest solely with leaders. Gigo argues that citizens, elites, journalists, and international observers all play roles in sustaining or confronting injustice. He asserts that people who have never lived under extreme oppression often underestimate why victims may welcome external intervention “by any means necessary.”
Lying Devils vs Cruel Devils: Moral Complexity
Gigo introduces a moral hierarchy of wrongdoing, distinguishing between deception and cruelty. While he considers lying a grave sin, he acknowledges that certain forms of cruelty can be worse. He suggests that moral judgement is inherently complex and cannot be reduced to slogans.
On allegations linking Maduro to drug trafficking, Gigo urges restraint and evidence. He rejects endless speculation but argues that political leaders involved in organised crime deserve harsher judgement than impoverished street-level offenders. In his view, accountability must apply equally — whether the accused is a Gambian trafficker or a sitting president.
Oil, Interests, and the Question of Justice
Addressing claims that Venezuela’s crisis is primarily about oil, Gigo argues that the issue is not extraction but distribution and governance. He calls for transparent international contracts and proposes bold benchmarks:
- At least 25% of oil revenue invested in education over the long term
- 5% allocated to global transparency tools, including widespread camera infrastructure
- 1–5% reserved for international interventions in resource-poor states
He acknowledges that the United States, if leading intervention efforts, deserves compensation — potentially 25–50% of contracts — but insists that Venezuelans must remain the primary beneficiaries.
Trump, Promises, and Power
Gigo’s position on former U.S. President Donald Trump is notably nuanced. He criticises Trump’s rhetoric, inconsistencies, and earlier military actions that harmed civilians, but acknowledges a shift in tone when Trump pursued Maduro through legal channels rather than indiscriminate force.
He questions vague slogans like “Make Venezuela Great Again,” urging journalists and civil society to demand measurable commitments, timelines, and transparency rather than rhetoric.
Lessons from Africa: The Gambia as a Mirror
Drawing from Gambian history, Gigo reflects on the regimes of Dawda Jawara and Yahya Jammeh. He argues that Jawara’s long tenure enabled systemic corruption through indifference, while Jammeh’s coup initially appeared as a “hard rescue” before devolving into deeper brutality.
The lesson, he says, is uncomfortable: voting alone may not be sufficient where education, accountability, and civic culture are weak. However, he stresses that not every flawed government justifies forceful removal — context and proportionality matter.
System Change Over Personality Change
A recurring warning in Gigo’s analysis is that regime change without system change is hollow. Financial reform, judicial independence, educational investment, and transparency mechanisms matter more than simply replacing leaders.
Akahi News gathered that he sees “culture of cameras” — broad, ethical surveillance for accountability — as more effective than sanctions, which often punish the poor while sparing elites.
Global Precedents and Moral Consistency
Gigo rejects selective outrage. He argues that apartheid South Africa required external pressure, that inaction in Sudan has cost countless lives, and that fear of “precedent” should not override evidence of mass suffering.
He criticises both Western indifference and nationalist hypocrisy, insisting that injustice anywhere threatens justice everywhere — echoing Martin Luther King Jr.’s warning.
Courts Over Bombs, Evidence Over Noise
While not dismissing force entirely, Gigo consistently prioritises lawful accountability. Arresting abusive leaders through courts, he argues, sends a stronger message than killing unnamed “small devils” while shielding powerful offenders.
He supports the idea that proven drug charges could justify Maduro’s arrest under U.S. law, while acknowledging the weakness of international legal frameworks.
A Call for Repentance, Not Chaos
Ultimately, Gigo frames regime change as a tragic necessity, not a celebration. He urges leaders worldwide to repent, reform, and act before force becomes inevitable. In his view, God — or history — may tolerate injustice for a time, but never indefinitely.
For Venezuela, Africa, the United States, and the world, he insists that learning, accountability, and moral courage remain the only sustainable alternatives to endless cycles of oppression and intervention.
The Advantages and Disadvantages of Regime Change, Beyond Venezuela.
I started the new year by wishing for confronting and defeating all liars and cruel ones worldwide, including regime and even system change. In many ways, I am against certain evils more than Trump, the u.s, the west, and any visible soul; And the evidence includes how I vividly justified coup based on very vivid conditions after the coup in Guinea, and no westerner+ dares debate my points from that verifiable article. The term regime change leans on military intervention from the international level, but it is not much different from the coups that many westerners hypocritically frowned at and sometimes support or carry out. My title clearly shows I believe regime change can be good or bad, but at what percentages and which other factors can play out? Regime change by any means necessary is a vague statement, except when can it be uttered and what ‘necessary’ means through different levels? Voting out is indeed a form of regime change, but we technically reserve the term regime change to mean ‘by force’. So what is the difference between a coup by civilians, a successful rebel, inside military coup, and outside military in risks beyond finance, loss of lives, trust, precedents, etc? Our experiences or memory can taint our leanings and imaginations, but reality matters where reciprocal-law knows universal love. Regime change is just a ‘what’, but why, how, and when are likely to determine if it is good or not. Can I shake the hand of Trump, the u.s, or xyz when they are right, but please help me God to slap him/them with my other hand or at least with words when they are wrong? OK! I hope Trump would not order a drone strike against me, then I will surely want God to intervene with a preemptive strike against Trump and all guilty Americans, and beyond?
Since Venezuela is the hot topic, I am obligated to discuss it more than other countries. I actually think removing Maduro could be a good to great thing, but how the world reacts matters, not just the u.s and Venezuelans.
Mindsets of Leaders: Once we accept bad leaders do exist, then there is nothing more dangerous than giving them blank immunity. There must be redlines and we consistently confront where need be. Like a sovereign person cannot be allowed to commit sins between creatures without confrontation, a sovereign nation cannot be allowed to commit certain wrongs with infinite tolerance or endless respite. A dictator or abuser who is ‘guaranteed’ no consequences is a respite against innocent people, except those who hold the mindset of ‘no external intervention’ may deserve to learn the hard way. Among the charges I heard against Maduro, the about six million Venezuelans who fled that country are the strongest evidence and where we need to learn from the most. Feel free to say 5 to 25% of them are guilty folks, but one innocent man can sometimes warrant even preemptive removal of a leader, depending on the mindset of the victim or potential victim. So despite the sub-title focused more on the Mindsets of the leaders, the mindset of the led and those arguing matter. If you were a truthful journalist in exile, you will likely welcome change by any means necessary. We can debate if the u.s is not also guilty of abusing up to journalists and activists like me, but every sane person will agree Venezuela is likely much worse. We can debate if God should be indifferent between devils, or should confront and defeat the big or small d[oers of]evils first, or respite the most repenting devil, the one that confronts devils most. Once we agree, devils deserve to be confronted by humans, devils, to invisible creatures like angels , then we welcome the fall of any devil. Please do not tell me thousand people who likely under-fought Maduro may suffer or die, because the millions that suffered and ran away matter. The much more higher millions must now know the importance of good leaders, including internal due confronting is often better than external confronting, including angels may confront even the u.s if it fails to repent where need be.
Potentially Lying devil versus cruel devil: Well, again, it may depend on many levels because Lying may generally be the worst sin, but some cruelty can be worse than some Lying. I think God may have a very complex point system on sins+, so I avoid all the three, especially lying and cruelty, which does not mean I condone stupidity. I do not believe the Fentanyl problem of the u.s was the primary reason to choose Venezuela over Mexico and China. I also do not believe the u.s drug supply will run short by even five percent by just removing Maduro. However, I do believe it is possible that Maduro was personally involved in cocaine dealings and other wrongs more than the leaders of Mexico and China. You cannot say interpol should arrest a drug dealer in the Gambia or Venezuela, but never when a president is involved. Even though I am generally sympathetic to poor drug dealers in a capitalist world, I think politicians and rich folks who deal drugs may deserve more punishment. So I would rather wait on the evidence on that, but did Maduro or any leader wrongly accuse others on drugs to deserve karma? Again, let’s wait on the evidence, not endlessly speculate.
On oil as the Primary reason: This is where the best of Venezuelans and the international world must honestly gauge the past and pressure the u.s for just distribution. For centuries, Venezuela did not even know they had oil until learning oriented u.s or xyz revealed it? So what percentages of the oil revenue went to learning in each administration versus different parties can now pledge and certified by the u.s and beyond in vivid contracts? I suspect contract oriented deceptive westerners had bad contracts to protect companies and were indifferent to ordinary Venezuelans. Spending ‘free or near free’ on social products or services that excluded enough learning and diversified learning led to decades of still unprepared Venezuela. Both Trump and Hegseth are clearly not just saying ‘stolen oil’ be paid, but the cost of the operation and terms of new contracts can be just or unjust. I recommend at least 25% of all the oil revenue be invested in education with transparency for Venezuelans; at least five percent of oil revenue be towards worldwide culture of cameras to reduce the need for such regime changes; another about one to five percent of the oil revenue be reserved to fund international intervention where resources may not exist.
We have heard both good and questionable wordings from Trump. When Trump says : ‘make Venezuela great again’, I wondered what great again truly means per country or when will we hear versus see make earth great again or greater than ever been? Politicians tend to be good with words or promises, but recordings are under utilized as pressure tools. Imagine Marco Rubio claiming : Trump is a president of actions and fulfil promises; then a video of Trump on promising cannabis legalization, then an Ai or satirical acknowledgement of ‘it does not matter what I promised or what Americans deserve or want, I can say I reclassify it and we run on another promise for votes…? ‘ Trump is clearly saying the Venezuelans people will benefit the most, but no journalist is so far asking an estimate of what percentage must go to Venezuela versus u.s companies, because I doubt if even 50% of the contracts will be just international awarding? I will be the first to say, The u.s deserves at least 25 to 50% of the contracts to cover the cost of the operation and as a reward on confronting evil. Freedom cannot be free, especially where humans sacrificed both money and lives, and may need dues from even an ‘orphan’ as service.
Genuinely oppressed people will desire help by any means necessary, from internal mobilisation to external mobilisation; through humans, lesser devils, Angels, and even God’s direct help. You can look at it from micro level, but the title pressures us to view it from macro levels. We can view it from broader history to recent history, but every defeated devil is a progress, even where a seemingly bigger devil may arise at times. Real life examples: I am the kind of a spirit who could have welcomed colonisation under a brutal African king. I may lose wealth stealing to colonisation , but what new blessings and challenges I may face during and after colonisation? No more Kings who used alive females as building pillars and what other atrocities colonisation removed at a cost? Please, let us fast forward to how much looting White saviours or false saviours did to the Gambia versus the Regime of president Dawda Jawara? There were not many cameras and I do not trust Historians are ever 100% truthful, but where they are 50% to 75% truthful, how do we use our minds to get more truth or confront their lies? It does not matter to me if a white or black person robs me or lies to me, I just do not want to be a victim anymore and actually want to confront wrongdoers worldwide.
So when the regime of President Jawara allowed mass corruption that indirectly suffered and killed thousands of Gambians, lying and deceptive westerners were against the coup for good or questionable reasons, but offered which other options? The mentally blind cannot see , agree, or debate the estimated numbers. Voting out was an option, but mandatory education up to age 18 or 20 was not pressured to give hope in decades of hard patience? Like many Gambians, I welcomed the coup of President Jammeh as a worthy gamble, but later understood it as ‘hard-rescue’. Needless to narrate how Jammeh was personally more corrupt and tried to end mass corruption that Gambians are addicted to until when? Needless to also admit Jammeh was a brutal coward in many ways, but at what level of brutality can we bank on Voting out versus regime change by any means necessary? I already said ‘necessary’ has levels and should not be confused with ‘by any means possible’. The late Malcolm X was right, and the u.s sincerely repenting then means no need for violence, courts, protests, or whatever they feared. Gambians admitting Jawara was a dangerous enabler of evil and guilty of indifference to poor children could have helped with Jammeh, including better Jammeh or removing him earlier by impressing God as truthful and ready to repent.
Since the Gambia has near zero natural resources, the u.s did very little to contain the wrongs of president Jammeh or forcefully remove him if international Red lines existed. Some may argue that was before Trump, but the inaction of Trump in Sudan and where else reveal shortcomings? If thousands died implicitly through Jawara and hundreds or thousands explicitly died through Jammeh, then learning and patience I recommend if the hard-rescue was good or not. The u.s did some other good for the Gambia, including how they may have helped Ecowas remove Jammeh after he refused to hand over power. Now under Barrow, I do not think we are anywhere close to justifying a coup or regime change by force. This does not mean I have much love for the Barrow administration or would have cried if he was defeated… I am yet to see Barrow care enough on mandatory education or culture of cameras, but no opposition leader is also running on those. If westerners do not need it, but Cuba did it with success, and we seem to have more negligent and cruel parents, then refusing to confront guilty parents from the Gambia to Nigeria+ is dangerous cowardice at bare minimum. Indifference on needs at the national level is like the karma that justifies indifference at the international level or interplanetary level. I hope God knocks on our doors at individual levels and judges us mercifully, but many countries are guilty more than we may admit. It is illusory or plain lies to claim Jammeh caused all or most of the problems the Gambia faces today. This is one example I know for sure, but a deep study of any country will reveal a similar reality of failed tests and dishonest assessment often lead to other tests, including a repeated test at easier or harder test.
Back to Venezuela: We can wish them well, pray for them, but we must also honestly advise them. Resources alone cannot develop a country and that sick mindset must also be ejected from Africans. Resources does not mean you ignore needed learning and working standards, or the future of the children. Big or too little, Venezuela helped poor Gambia when Jammeh was in power. What is financial help to a dictator without even advice? Funding oppression or what precise crime? The purpose could have been genuine or just for political support at the international stage. Venezuela helped Cuba and I sincerely think the u.s is wrongly persecuting and lying against Cuba. The facts remain Cuba seems to be international sponsors of health, not terrorism. I think the u.s Funding enough cameras in Cuba and worldwide can be a lot more helpful than sanctions that tend to affect the poor more than the questionable elite.
Venezuela’s alleged ties with Iran and other terrorist organisations are disturbing. We cannot accept every claim the lying u.s makes, but sometimes the evidence on the ground hints the u.s is not always lying. Regardless of the wrongs u.s may do, a big country like Iran should not have food shortages unless God withdraws his sun and water. So poor management and over spending on weapons is a crime many of these governments share with the u.s, if not worse on proportionate level. It is vital to understand due learning matters and it is not smart to fight the u.s unless you are ready for 100% Godly ways based on conscience, not inherited religious or cultural interpretations. If you are proportionately a bigger devil than the u.s, then you may deserve up to double punishment; if you are a smaller devil but refuse to repent, then how can you expect help from a just God? Remember God has the right to be indifferent when two devils fight, or use a devil against other devils until the last devil is crushed or forgiven based on willingness to repent. So I urge you all to repent, from individual to government levels. Go search for my ‘top four universal targets ‘, including strong culture of cameras for character and confronting sins between creatures more than angelic or devilish u.s. Despite my criticism against the u.s , I agree with the u.s on many fronts, but happens to be harder than the u.s on some issues. If I had the power of u.s, worldwide culture of cameras and confronting the guilty up to government level would have been a priority more than going to Mars or any planet.
I am not sure if I need to write the long list of disadvantages of regime change, because many writers are already on that. How the regime change occurred matters, and Trump rightly says: ‘no quick exit’. It does not mean we leave everything for Trump to decide, but to publicly suggest in manners that will force Trump to accept enough good. What kinds of elections will occur, by when, level of transparency, etc matters. Details on pledges matter, because a party that says prioritise education versus will invest at least 10% to 25% of the due oil revenue on education for 25 years are different. How much on culture of cameras for civilians and which institutions to reform in a fairly detailed manner?
Presently, we cannot even say regime change occurred in Venezuela in a meaningful sense. Removing a person is not removing a regime. Like administrative change can vary within party lines, and vary a lot more between parties, change of a head may not mean much. We should hope the pressure from Trump can translate to enough changes in the short term, but system change is even better for Venezuela, u.s, the Gambia, and many other countries. Optimistic folks like myself assume or mean system change as positive, but again those terms can be both good and bad, plus they come with branches. Financial system change is very different from judicial system change.
Waking up to the news, my mind went to God through certain verses:
[Quran Chapter 100]
1. By the racers [any moving vehicle] panting.
2. Igniting sparks.
3. Raiding at [often]dawn.
Skipping some verses:
[Quran 100:8] And he is fierce in his love of wealth.
These verses are very prophetic and were largely misinterpreted by submitters to those who claimed Muhammad was ‘insane’. Verse 8 can be interpreted from personal level to now varying levels of groups. The lone robber to the street gangs; the national leader who violently raids cannabis folks over wealth or the media houses for gambling his/her wealth and xyz; to the international wars that are largely for wealth versus good cause were almost before the eyes of the angels? The very last verse of that chapter then hints about re-judging.
The opponents of regime change are in two to three groups. If you never lived under an extremely oppressive regime, then only thinking can help you imagine where external help for regime change is like or better than rain as largely vivid blessing and oil as a questionable blessing. The questionable elite in oppressive or third world countries may also oppose regime change due to the greed+ they enjoy or due to fear of the gamble. They prefer the status quo and are blind to the importance of confronting wrongs, internally and/or externally?
The other groups that are totally against any regime change in the west are often stupid, cruel, or indifferent. A white nationalist who cannot see war is sometimes business that financially benefits the west is stupid when arguing how wars cost them money. A white nationalist who wants war for money is cruel , but the white nationalists who see vivid injustices somewhere and refuse to sacrifice even money are also cruel or at least guilty of indifference. Of course I know many blacks+ are in these groups, sometimes not understanding what numbers mean with and without intervention for regime change. The reality remains it was mainly whites and mainstream that held the narrative until recently and thanks to the questionable social media. It is extremely hard to say if the u.s military interventions did more good or bad around the world, except where Israel was directly or indirectly involved. You can focus on the extreme, but I am not even totally condemning u.s on the nuclear bombs on Japan, if you study the atrocities of Japan and what they were proportionately capable of. In Africa, u.s likely played a negative role military wise, but again not totally. We must also ask where they helped contain cruel African leaders as examples. Then similarly with the Arab world, where even terrible terrorism against the west is like a blessing in disguise. If you believe only when Americans or westerners are affected warrant intervention, then you are saying other innocent folks should learn to fight by now or indifference is ok until I pray you get affected, or God to be indifferent to you somewhere and charge you for ingratitude… MLK was right, ‘[certain levels of ]injustices anywhere is a threat to Justice anywhere ‘. The respite on sins between creatures was a hard test and our global village demands both collaboration and tolerance. Our differences should not mean imposition to the dot, but a range for learning towards perfection. So all countries should oppose physical or sexual assault as a crime, but how we punish may vary. Then we honestly gauge and advise each other where need be. People like me think six months jail for physical assault is too small, or some people may rather take the laws into their own hands… Then gangs towards mass immigration will offend the likes of Trump differently. Like you should not be indifferent to oppression between individuals, other forms of oppression tend to demand intervention even more. With culture of cameras and honest gauging, we can determine where good intervention matters. Who can deny the world failed timely intervention or regime change for Apartheid South Africa mattered. You must be out of mind to claim the South African blacks were capable of fighting that alone, but some sick Africans may deserve terrible things due to such mindset or fear of intervening. Both parties are seemingly in Sudan, but courting up to regime change in the UAE can certainly save countless lives in Sudan. The worst may just say financial interest matters even where pressure up to regime change is sometimes needed. We do not have to rush to regime change, but it should not be off the table. Evidence matters the most and this is why evidence gathering tools like worldwide culture of cameras is a need more than vaccine globalisation.
Precedents and Seeming Conflict on My Position(s): When Trump kept on bombing the boats, my leaning was clearly against Trump because innocent people, neglected people, and perhaps some small d[oers of]evils were attacked and killed without due process like courts and Trump was seemingly sparing the big to biggest devil(s)? That I believe is a dangerous precedence that other countries can easily wrongly copy. However, Trump going after Maduro through the court house and largely saying good for the suffering Venezuelans shifted my leaning that he is not Afraid of big devils of which races or based on what level of evidence? I do not think those who argue about China and Taiwan on precedents are honest. Taiwan is not ignoring millions of its citizens that are begging God for intervention like Venezuela. I think evidence matters most, so I recommend China, the u.s, Russia, and any big state you fear may wrongly follow right or wrong precedents should heavily invest in worldwide culture of cameras and other evidence gathering tools. If you are a small country in fear, then also shift roads or other projects towards a strong culture of cameras to improve character+ and even prevent potential invasion.
Further examples: If me and you had 5 to 10 diseases, I would have preferred God to heal the worst and worse ones first, but wouldn’t you welcome any healing or back and forth conquering between small and big diseases? It is not much different in the character world. Confronting Maduro in the decent way of courts is much more welcomed than the questionable bombings Trump started with. Of course I am not privy to the level of evidence Trump or the u.s may possess, so when small devils partner up or guard big devils, then it becomes legitimate to confront or even proportionately kill the small devils at the doors. So I still stand by my seemingly two different positions. Arresting Netanyahu, Jammeh, or any abusive leader is much better than going after the smaller questionable or guilty fishes. So I hope God makes 2026 a great year by confronting and defeating the biggest devils in every country, perhaps the smaller devils may then learn, repent, and amend towards worldwide peace. Let God kill or arrest ‘Satan’ or the biggest invisible liars or devils that whisper illusions and beyond.
Using the visible good ones against the visible devils is sometimes much better than using angels, because if Maduro was killed by a stroke or mysterious sickness, many devils may not fear. I suspect the few or many leaders in the drug world may be a lot more careful, or will Europe pay Trump to confront the leaders of Bissau+ if they persist on drugs as alleged? As terrible as it seems, what percentage of the people of Bissau versus Venezuelans flee or are reportedly persecuted with reasonable evidence? So God choosing Venezuela first is a good allow for 2026. Now quick repentance by all leaders matter, or more conquering by humans or Angels matter. Even Trump must not abuse, or let humans or angels ‘whack’ him a lot more towards repentance or be defeated, and final judgment day to stand on earth… Wrong doing folks, especially the leaders, should not feel safe anymore. Enough on the respite and serious conquering begins or speeds up significantly.
The legality of Maduro’s arrest based on u.s laws can easily be navigated if the drug charges can be proven. On international law, we still lack a good international force to do many things, or even enough clear international laws. The u.s has so much power and is still the seemingly most caring nation to sacrifice its wealth and lives for world peace, except inconsistently. So I will continue to call out the u.s where I deem fit, but remember if the u.s is 75 to 95% right and not indifferent to world victims, while you are at 40% to 75% right and indifferent, then me and God should not give you more power. I do admire China on helping the poor on affordability more than the u.s and the West in general, but wealth, health, and character are different in any honest analysis. The u.s is arguably the worst on world wealth, because they promote a very brutal form of Capitalism and are indifferent at international level, plus they fight alternatives like Lovism and even some Socialism. The fairly good news is the Internet and other blessings are making it harder to lie without being challenged. So let’s hope that God helps a lot more and make 2026 a year of over fifty thousand years worth of evolution, at least to those sincerely repenting and understanding the nature of urgency. Speed matters and may as many as possible succeed, far beyond the few countries that directly or indirectly served me. May God bless Showlove Trinity: let’s learn, let’s work, let’s have fun.
By Jarga Kebba Gigo
An Activist and Transformer
🎓 Attend 2026 JAMB, Post-UTME, WAEC, and NECO GCE Tutorials
Get fully prepared with expert tutors, comprehensive study materials, and personalised academic guidance at Akahi Tutors.
📍 Located at 67, Oduduwa College Road, Off Sabo Junction, Ile-Ife.
📞 Call: 08038644328
for enrollment and accommodation reservation.
Author of Juts Quhr-aahn
