Are People Deaf or Just Ungrateful?

Politicians, especially western politicians,  tend to be very careful of their words, so you must use your mind to hear their actual standing and ask more questions to help the public. Where they are specific or semi-specific, the public should not accept the sacrificing of the most essential contributors/minorities. I will use censorship and cannabis legalisation as examples, but urge you and the journalists to be a lot more vigilant and grateful. Since the u.s is heading for elections, using them as examples makes a lot of sense. The race to repentance is the journey of humankind, from the ordinary public who sadly accepts to be sheeps of inconsiderate politicians, through the journalists who are like the bridge with a leaning, to the actual politicians who are also sometimes ignorant of their test under a universal Lord.

Censorship is a rising huge problem, far beyond the two main parties in the u.s. There are different types and levels of censorship, so we must narrow our discussion around the title. It puzzles me so much why censorship and the way forward  are not major in the 2024 elections. First, the so-called ‘free speech’ is a God given right and the constitution is just re-affirming it for the secular minds. Once you understand it as God given right, then you cannot say Julian Assange and non u.s citizens are not protected. Our right and responsibility to seek truth is greater than our ‘right to seek happiness’ through alcohol, marijuana, money, etc. Of course ungrateful Americans may be at different levels, but again our positions as non Americans matter. 

The whistle blower vs publisher: When the Obama-Biden administration refused to charge Assange in sincere care, avoiding hypocrisy, or acknowledging foreign publishers have rights, Trump was super deaf, but how many were deaf? Trump, being the dangerous con-artist that is worse than the u.s establishment, spoke well of Assange, but only to brutally hunt him, including pressuring weak Ecuador? Me and you may have been naive to believe Trump in 2016, but being blind to his actions as president and deaf to his rhetoric to jail even comedians make him the ideal candidate of ‘free speech protector’ of Elon Musk, Joe Roegan, and which naive popular American ? No! I mean it is very worrisome when ms. Clinton said on video that they want ‘total control’ of social media, but considering she is not running, we can ask if she is the ‘project 2025’ of the democrats that Harris should be questioned on? Slightly more worrisome is Tim Walz using the wrong old example of ‘you cannot shout fire in a crowded hall’ to justify potential social media censorship during the VP debate, because he is running… Cowards should never dictate what is dangerous words or actions, or you risk the censoring of Jarga on even ‘dangerous’ marijuana… 

Considering what ms. Sarah Palin said of using special forces to Assassinate Assange and what Trump and Mike Pompeo did, we know the Republicans are so far much worse on free speech, but they are brave enough to hypocritically confront the democrats on it? I think it is a blessing for Elon Musk and Trump to own social media companies, because they will resist the worst of democrats, but how will you help punish democrats+ if they refuse to repent? We know the democrats will protect publishers, but not whistleblowers against the government. We are yet to see Republicans who want reasonable protection for both. Without the whistle blowers, the publishers cannot tell us much, except speculations. So we become ungrateful by agreeing to sacrifice whistle-blowers as a norm. By refusing simple efforts, we become part of the problem. Feel free to try all candidates, but trusting Trump is dangerous. So have him on record, but focus more on Harris and even Jill Stein… Do you believe whistle-blowers who expose government cruelty should be in prison? The crafty politicians will switch to government stupidity or ‘protecting [cruel] officers’ matter. Well the question was cruelty and you have to insert words where need be. ‘My government has the right to hide anything, classify anything’, means the deaf cannot hear : ‘it includes lying and cruelty’ like or worse than Trump? Let me whisper to you, ‘not to American citizens’ means the deaf and ungrateful Americans see themselves as supreme and you accept it or doing what? When non-Americans are fighting for American whistleblowers and for sick Americans to have access to medical cannabis, then are immigrants or the internet very dangerous? 

Ms. Kamala Harris is arguably much better than Biden and Trump on cannabis, but she seems to prefer to ‘run on a problem rather than solve it’ by when? Where is her plan or even ‘concept’ of a plan to legalize cannabis and by when? When asked about cannabis, she laughs instead of the serious frown when talking about abortions? Two black men interviewing her in her home seemed deaf when she said, ‘I don’t believe people should go to jail for using cannabis’. Only the deaf cannot hear she means the sellers and farmers of cannabis should go to jail until legalized at the federal level and which republicans can stop her from pardoning? The dumbest among you may argue, she added, I think it should be legalized. Again, only the blind cannot see the limited political pardons of Biden-Harris largely excluded cannabis sellers and farmers. You can argue she has limitations as VP, but only the deaf cannot contrast her tone when talking what affects mainly men versus women or children? Since the problem is beyond politicians, how many ungrateful Americans+ think those who resisted or are still resisting government lies about cannabis should continue to suffer? Activism matters, but without the farmers and dealers, our knowledge on medical cannabis would have been limited. Feel free to accuse all or most of them did it for money, but how many had humanitarian reasons, and what kind of a patient will be indifferent to a ‘doctor’ before Britney Griner refused to advocate for the ‘poor Britney Griners’ who are ‘wrongly’ held in how many u.s states? Sometimes I honestly get scared by how many ungrateful folks are on marijuana or on earth? When at least ten millions Americans are accessing or denied legal cannabis, and we cannot get even one million users ready to ‘break-down’ the Whitehouse and congress until it is legalized; then I wonder if LGBTQ folks seem more grateful or understand politicians must be pressured to do good? Of course I am not advocating for violence in the first week or first to act , but I am not the type who will allow one by one violence of police against me and millions of people, then rule out anything for my freedom. I believe freedom is something you ask and/or fight for; so I may humbly ask for months or years, I may fight through the courts, but I may also call for even armed protests with cameras, and any police that try to arrest my ‘Martin Luther king’ or be brutal to anyone of us will be dealt with by ‘any means necessary’. Now the word necessary does not mean by any means possible. It does not mean starting violence, but it includes every form of fighting back.

So let no Obama assume the reason why some black men are reluctant to Harris is due to her gender. My leaning is clearly Harris, but I am suspicious of her spirit, and I won’t cry, frown, or worry over five seconds if Trump wins. The establishment must understand they are part of the problem and contribute to why Trump surged in 2016. We have to be sincerely loved or we separate; but we do not want politicians who are like porn stars or worse than prostitutes to us. We are not taking excuses, but demanding specific efforts. Do not put a cannabis bill with something the Republicans desperately hate and claim the republicans blocked it. Like the many states, consider at least two separate bills — one federal medical marijuana bill and one recreational . Over 70% of Republicans in congress will likely support legalizing federal medical marijuana. If 25 % or xyz oppose recreational, ask which regulations they oppose at federal level, then move those to be at the state level. Demand by when will the bills be presented and can we get monthly pardons until the bills pass? May God bless me and every trying soul through Showlove Trinity: let’s learn, let’s work, let’s have fun.

By Jarga kebba Gigo

An Activist and Transformer

Author of Juts Quhr-aahn.

Optional note:

The problem of cannabis or language is far beyond jail. It was the denial of working opportunities that motivated my type, because I was not a user then and almost saw it in a negative light, but cannot fathom how you can deny millions of people working opportunities over a plant? So when the Biden-Harris administration reportedly denied working opportunities, in the Whitehouse, to cannabis users, it hinted at their reluctance towards sincere repentance. When you talk about Harris prosecuting hundreds of mainly black-males over cannabis, I may defend her knowing I am not above being misled; but I see the millions of people denied working opportunities and the near zero efforts to rectify that, then solid promises is the only thing where Harris can differentiate from Biden. Yes! I oppose dangerous promises like the Gaza war, but over 67% of Americans are now understanding the oppression was never right. If you study the Maryland pardon through numbers, then you can tell millions are still affected by these bad laws. Organizations have different approaches, but I think Norml should be a lot more into continuous protest or support an organisation that does. The time of waiting is over, they must do it now or see the consequences…

I think new laws are needed to protect all whistle-blowers where government lies or cruelty is involved. We must also demand pardons for Snowden, or where is American+ gratitude? With smart laws, we protect all, far beyond Assange, Snowden, etc. Considering Trump re-prosecuted Manning, I do not expect much good from Trump on such. The only purpose of trying to have him and other top republicans on record is to use it against his folks, like Vance, Desantis, etc where need be, in the future. They are accusing each other of lying and cruelty at personal and party level; but lying and cruelty are worse at state and international levels. Only greedy and arrogant citizens will want politicians who will lie or be cruel for them, for money or cowardly vague security ‘interest’? We must re-educate the ordinary citizens. The purpose of talking to all party leaders on certain issues includes adding perspective and switching others. Only after Biden said he was considering Assange, we heard a softer stand from Trump, which may not have been honored, but that statement reduced the chances of Trump and his supporters from attacking Biden on Assange. Similarly, once we have one party agree all cruelty, rape, or so and so government cruelty can be exposed without fear, then the other party will likely join our direction. May the Lord of freedom and achievements help us a lot more. We can be very thankful that Assange and Manning are finally free, and Trump may instead go to jail; that Snowden is free and not the traitor Obama or xyz called him; but no major media house is yet to pledge ‘daily’ listing of all whistle-blowers in custody and that make them ungrateful in my book of efforts versus enough efforts. Trump and Biden may likely die within ten to twenty years; but the lying and cruelties of states should die much quicker and are far more a danger to the limited democracy in and beyond the U.S. We pray for God to make us victorious by any means necessary.

Optional note 2.

The dangers of assumptions goes way beyond the elections. When Obama assumes he thinks the reason why ‘black [American] men’ are not into Kamala is due to her gender , it will have at least three effects. 1. The probably under five percent of blacks who may be that level of sexist may or may not re-think. However, you will probably miss the over 95% who have good to badquest reasons against Kamala or democrats in general. 2. When the over 10% of black+ who hate democratic micro-managing and censorship as number one and two, then say thirdly that the government should not be like our ‘mothers’, you may reduce 3 problems as one? 3. When ten million girls/women believe Obama’s assumption, one million may avoid black men as ‘they do not value women’, one million may misinterpret every difference as ‘is it because I am a woman’? Then one million men like me or xyz may separate against the children or pray for much better Obama to rectify the minds. Beyond immigrants, is Trump and/or Obama seeding separation of families, knowingly or unknowingly?

Rather than assumptions, send a team to interview at least one thousand blacks and every group that does not seem to like Kamala. Above all, try to advise Kamala to be better on policies and seriously consider leaving alcohol or switching to marijuana as test/research. Kamala’s tone may be naturally like that, but it often sounds like a ‘wine Mum’. Yes! I think people should focus on content rather than tone, but if she can leave or reduce alcohol to her benefit beyond health, then it is certainly worth it. Obama also knows many people over-tie Kamala to Biden, and he can advise her and the public, using how Biden ruled differently than Obama. Cuba is one vivid example.

Crafty politicians like Biden do some basic maths, banking on people who are self centered, deaf,  and/or ungrateful. For every thousand cannabis users with records, you may have ten to thirty dealers with records. By semi-pardoning the users who may still be denied working opportunities beyond the white house, the ungrateful media, the people, and even some cannabis activists may celebrate without questioning it amounts to thousands of Cannabis dealers are still in prison and/or hunted more than rapists? Thinking is way above the questionable caring or hypocritical empathy the democrats claim.

Similarly, we know there are questionable folks on social media, but censorship is not the way and may God curse those who pursue it, even in the name of caring. Besides threats, which we can have better laws to fight it, we cannot support censorship of even so-called ‘hate speech’. Obama or who else may censor my truth as ‘kamala hating’; or how can we trust Republicans will always define hate speech correctly? There are many ways to confront hateful words and the government cannot 100% ‘protect’ people through cowardly laws. If you gain ten cowardly voters, you may lose hundred brave voters who vehemently oppose censorship. If you suppress speech to a certain level, you may have an uprising that may kill thousands or even millions, while over worrying over tens of lives ? Educate the people, prosecute threats, encourage culture of body cameras+ by civilians, strongly prosecute those who dare harm innocent people, etc but stay away from supporting censorship that even people cannot detect — it is a far much higher right than your so-called second amendment. Karma may hit you from different levels. A censored victim may act in worse ways, or just pray and God may hunt even the voters who support censoring politicians without a fight. So vote Harris and fight her hard where need be, even where Obama+ may accuse you of being sexist. And if you do see meaningful change within months, then try to form a new party, join the green party, and/or overwhelmingly vote republicans come mid term. I certainly do not agree with sitting it out, but we are not democrats and not buying into their many cowardly positions of even fearing words. We will also change or kill capitalism, Lord be willing. As said in my other articles, voting Jill Stein is not smart, they need a better party constitution and realistic approach to and beyond winning. A president of the u.s has way over 200 positions to hire, beyond cabinet and ambassadors; so a party that cannot find even 500 people to run for lower offices is simply not yet a ‘serious’ party, as AOC rightly put it. If she hires people who are unwilling to work before she wins, then what kind of lazy privileged folks would they be?  I think you should run educational ads to potential third party voters, try them mid term, but let us defeat the censoring and super capitalist Trump. 

Everyday I fear God may charge me for over-loving even girls, not just women. So dismiss the guessing Obamas and ask God to bless us squarely, not just curse the guilty among them. Stop harming us, stop denying us working and business opportunities, stop seeding differences between men and women, stop censoring us, stop acting like you are gods above us to micro-manage us, etc. Personal rights matter! Kamala and countless lawmakers cannot keep drinking and offering us alcohol, while jailing us over cannabis. Well, I hope we and our God fight smartly and give us victory, not the false hopes of Obama and others.