Gigo Exposes the Huge Differences Between False and Real 360-Degree Cameras – Demands Urgent Industry Reform

Jarga Kebba Gigo argues that the vast majority of so-called 360-degree cameras on the market today are dangerously misleading, offering only 30 to 90 degrees of actual coverage while relying on flawed AI tracking that smart criminals can easily evade. He contrasts these false cameras – which he likens to a “one-eyed watchman with a 360-degree neck” – with genuine 360-degree systems that require at least four fixed eyes and, ideally, two movable neck-eyes for true, uninterrupted surveillance. Gigo calls for urgent public education, government regulation, manufacturer accountability, and local research into camera technology, warning that indifference from journalists, influencers, and authorities amounts to negligence that leaves homes and offices vulnerable.

The Huge Differences Between False and Real  360 Degree Cameras, plus Realisable Futuristic Standards. 

Can the whole world or most of the world be wrong and Jarga be right? Indeed, I am the righteous minority that can defeat every guilty majority. Since this is the age of evidence, I simply ask you to honestly gauge the verifiable facts the Lord reveals through me. History taught us a big chunk of humankind once thought that the earth is flat and being right is sometimes dangerous or hard. Similarly, so-called professionals and multimillion dollar companies can be dangerously wrong under questionable states. The term ‘wrong’ can varyingly be through ignorance, lying, or even cruelty. If it is through ‘ignorance’, they may humbly learn, repent,  amend, and proclaim as per ch.2:160. The difference between wrong and dangerously wrong is about the impact that the mentally blind cannot see.  Consumers deserve all the facts that may help them, and misleading statements or descriptions can fall under deceptions, especially after vivid knowledge or a window of repentance is opened. Do you want a watchman with one-eye and deceptive exaggerated neck, or  a watchman with many eyes and potentially two necks may seem confusing until you read through?

Human evolution in the world of knowledge is largely real, but sadly slow due to reluctance to understand 100% facts and seeking the highest possible truth will speed up that very evolution we need and benefit from. Decades ago, we had simplistic stationary cameras that may cover around 30 to 90 degrees on average, but permanently.  A few years ago, we invented a moving or tracking version we wrongly called 360-degree cameras. An unchallenged ‘lie’ will likely remain as a fact and is sometimes hard to erase even after vivid facts eventually surface. The good news is the real 360-degree cameras are here, and the truthful God has chosen me to show the differences. 

False 360 Degree Cameras : Arguably, 50% to 75% of the security cameras in 2026 are false 360 Degree cameras.  The manufacturers called them 360 Degree cameras, because under regulating governments are either guilty of ignorance or just indifferent. The gullible journalists,  gullible sales people,  ordinary people,  etc all echo in ignorance, but who will learn first, after me? I think the honest social media ‘reviewers’ of cameras are our best bet to lead the repentance, then the mainstream media and government may come later.

Just because a camera can move 360 degrees does not mean it is a real 360-degree camera in the essential aspects.  Every smart customer wants 360 Degree coverage at all times, but these false 360 Degree cameras may dangerously give you about 30 to 90 degrees coverage and smart criminals can trick them in many ways.  These cameras largely depend on AI tracking that may be confusing to non-technical folks.  So we should rather explain it in layman’s terms until we can afford video podcasts, or let influencers compete to help their viewers.  These cameras or ‘watchman’ essentially have a 360-degree neck with one eye that can only see 30 to 90 Degrees on average or at a time. Once you understand there is a huge difference between a neck and an eye, versus two well situated eyes, versus four or more well situated eyes, then you can reflect on the huge differences.  That is one of the physical differences that is beyond software updating. 

Tracking Issues: In many of these false 360-degree cameras, the tracking is fairly good after the capturing, but extremely dumb like a sleeping or video watching watchman. First, too fast or too slow movement can trick some tracking systems of these cameras, and some may not even record if no movement is detected. We must demand continuous recordings, mandatory or educate the consumers towards pressure.  Secondly, if the cameras are facing east, you can steal or rape+ from the west or north, and it may never track or record you. Essentially, many or all of them need at least timing updates for their present customers.   Better is for the government to act, or public pressure, for universal updating towards real 360-degree cameras. The government can pressure them to change the marketing label of 360-degree. The public can demand software updates that the ‘neck’ should move every one or five minutes to scan the area, and if activity or movement is detected, then they can track to smart likings. I won’t still buy such cameras where I have the choice for real 360-degree cameras.  

Real 360-degree cameras will preferably have four eyes, each eye should be capable of 90 to 180-degree coverage range, plus one or two necks with tracking eyes capabilities. I do not need to explain the purpose of the eyes. Having an upper and lower moving neck-eye can be helpful on zooming and other benefits.  Every negative thing I mentioned in the false 360-degree cameras can be rectified with the real 360-degree cameras.  Although I am yet to see the two-necks types of cameras I imagined, there are many 3 eye cameras in the market and about the same cost of the false 360-degree cameras. So lack of aggressive marketing of the best companies and low consumer knowledge are partly to blame.  

Tricking the false 360-degree cameras: I am not here to help thieves who may hardly read or office criminals with such cameras,  but to educate the populace and up to manufacturers+ to make it a lot harder for thieves and other criminals.  Imagine a thief or office criminal dancing on the west side of the false 360-degree cameras to distract a dumb camera, while the other criminal steals or gropes in the east. Your purchasing officers of false 360-degree cameras owe me how much, or will you share to deserve how much? If the tracking or recording is activity oriented,  then how about if activities are happening in multiple directions? We must learn faster than criminals and appreciate God’s blessings with speed embracing,  plus helping the poor sincerely.  I am not saying there is no good in the false 360-degree cameras, but why shortchange yourself where you have a choice? Seeking perfection is vital, or read my last major article: ‘perfection versus Negligence…’, plus my name.  We must quickly pressure the manufacturers of such cameras to update not just the software,  but the design towards perfection.  

Realisable Futuristic Standards: In my last article,  I mentioned the importance of new designs and placement variations. Having a snake or xyz like camera with at least four eyes and two moving neck-eyes on a fence corner should be slightly different from the camera you may place on the wall or actual building.  Every area should have multiple covering cameras if one fails and for multiple angles.  Then a tower like an extended pole or sentry at the center of the compound or office will help. Where are the architects who care about modern security,  not just beauty? 

Having an updating port: By demanding or suggesting all cameras to have updating ports like mobile or cellular phones,  manufacturers can add things like ‘wireless charging ‘ and other inventions that may come up with time. 

Universal Standards and Opening Markets: The embracing of the future means inevitable strong culture of cameras.  So our NVRs or other recorders should minimally or on average be about 16 to 32 channels or cameras.  The added cost be it physical ports or wireless capabilities cannot be much if we truly care about security and stress… We should share the technology,  because many camera companies may be good in some aspects,  but struggling in others. By having countless universal recording systems, people may fear less about cameras and be capable of having different cameras from different companies, integrating nicely. 

Every camera should primarily be controlled locally, but the options of Internet or remote control is OK. The recorders should have ‘router’ and ‘intranet’ capabilities, so that wars, totalitarian leaders, or mighty u.s+ cannot stop you from recording,  just like you cannot stop them from recording. We must balance the powers. So China, EU, AU, etc must understand the importance of local control, and sponsor much more research and the capabilities of independent operations if the need ever arises.  It makes no sense that every update must go through the internet,  because it inadvertently means potential failures from a distance and no revival capabilities if the Gambia, Nigeria, or xyz does not research, open updates+ through ports, or country level intranet.  The cameras of the president and crucial offices should preferably be modified and largely controlled locally.  I strongly believe that every country or region should quickly strive to research and manufacture its own camera systems.  The technology is not very complex. It does not mean I support banning imports of cameras or their accessories,  but having the knowledge is vital to contain bad actors where need be. Like they cannot totally fight cannabis,  VPN, etc, people will be able to have any good camera they may ban in fear. Our offices and our homes are slightly different, even to the near 100%  transparent oriented folks like me.  Almost every country may have potential enemies at a given time, so how do you guard against evil governments,  evil groups in and outside your country? You will need knowledge and near constant research and development on information related matters.  

A long list of standards may scare some or confuse the non-technical folks, so I will end it here with a reminder. Over one million people may buy the wrong types of cameras by next week, so you should try to help such by sharing beyond family members. Do not over worry about the manufacturers,  but do send them the information. Share with influencers, especially tech oriented influencers, including those who should repent after recommending poor cameras. By next week, we should be able to move manufacturers more than thieves and other criminals may teach many in the hard way. Do you want perfect things beyond cameras, but refuse to help others on even cameras? Do not be indifferent,  because the Lord of knowledge chooses me in care above many and I want the care to speedily spread around the world. Empathy, wishes, and even prayers are slightly low good in my world . We must ‘exhort each other to the whole sweet truth…’ for achievements and sweet patience. Our questionable leaders may be guilty of ignorance or much worse, but me and you should care beyond our borders. We are under a universal perfect Lord, and this is why rising believers pray: ‘perfect our Light’ in every sense of perfection.  May God bless Showlove Trinity: let’s learn, let’s work,  let’s have fun. 

By Jarga Kebba Gigo 

An Activist and Transformer 

Author of Juts Quhr-aahn 

Optional notes: 

Hey! Heyy!! Heyyy!!! Your trusted Engineers, managers, sales people,  journalists,  influencers, reviewers, etc may claim 360-degree cameras, but Jarga comes with irrefutable facts. Make the videos in demonstrations.  Let four or more people act in different directions around three different false 360-degree cameras and you will discover how many potentially important activities you may miss. Should you do split screens to show what a real 360-degree cameras may show in the same scenarios? So Jarga! Are you bragging like Trump, claiming to be brighter than the whole world in one, few, many,  or all aspects ? Well,  many of you accused Trump of misleading statements , so shame on a journalists+ who echo misleading statements after evident opportunity of learning and/or teaching? If you do not publish mine and/or write your own, then you may be guilty of more than atom’s weight of indifference.  When your readers or viewers suffer because you refuse to teach them on time, then how meaningless is ’empathy’ if you refuse to teach even the authorities you may blame.  Even Jarga may have once called them 360-degree cameras,  but Jarga humbly learns, repents,  and amends when the perfect Lord gives him opportunity.  Jarga joyfully proclaims or teaches, even where I am not getting financial rewards like journalists to the world leaders. I urge for strong culture of cameras like none on earth ,  so I want the buyers and manufacturers to move fast towards perfection. 

So I choose to call them false 360-degree in this article,  but should we call them occasional 360-degree,  partial 360-degree,  dummy 360-degree,  illusory 360-degree,  etc is open for debate.  However,  calling them 360-degree cameras is not the smartest or most honest description.  Every effort matters. Those of you with photo or video editing talents should spring to work. The photo of the article can be with or without my face, but I prefer at least three pictures there: 1: Outdated looking camera, marked X and outdated; 2: false 360-degree camera and you imagine the labels and markings; 3: an available 360-degree cameras in the market; 4: An AI or artist generated Futuristic 360-degree cameras with two (upper &lower)  moving necks to inspire readers to manufacturers.  You can visit a camera store, or search and choose the top 3 pictures from the internet… Where is the Lord who will send me a billion dollars or at least million dollars asap? 

Should the Ambassador of China or xyz send it to his/her president and which authorities to help which manufacturers +? Should the top tax officials send it to their counterparts to help far beyond manufacturers? Who should send it to the importers to shift leaning and save us more than money? Who should send it to influencers or will mainstream TV/Media care enough to make a special edutaining video versus lame reporting? Is it breaking news, or like Jesus or an alien coming to earth to rectify your most trusted minds? I suspect I am too old or too poor to be writing,  instead of having a podcast?

Shouldn’t we appreciate knowledge and knowledgeable people beyond prayers or words? I can hear the guilty  Africans+ said if my contribution was a new kick in soccer, or new throw in basketball, then going to a western team is a blessing.  So do scientists or engineers learn or only steal ideas? Should I move to China , u.s, or xyz to help rapidly move a company or industry, if Africa refuses to learn or invest? They said I need a formal degree and great citizenship, but I beat degree holders in many aspects, not just the cameras in today’s discussion.  No! I am not bragging, but trying to show you ‘Researchers Access Store or (RAS)’ may produce hundreds,  thousands,  or millions of Jargas, or better, inside Africa alone. We should learn to listen and give opportunities to the poor. We should appreciate knowledge and truth, because seeking perfection matters. We must accept before we can further seek or spread. So can you accept every truth in this article or trivialise what percentage of the truth you understand versus the truth you are yet to understand? May God help me and the trying,  with or without you.